‘The Appointment’

Two women stumble their way home after a night out, unaware that one of them is to be kidnapped by a stalker – by you.
Whoever you decide to kidnap will change the course of all their lives forever, and its up to you to decide their destinies…

Style

- Naturalistic / realism (no SFX) / no music

- Tripod-free zone? Shakycam Fluidity… Immediacy

- Drama / Dark comedy

Content

- 3 Act structure, choice to make at each break

- 5 to 10 minutes long

- Only one or two locations (depending on…)

Finance

- Transport + Catering
- Stay local
- Expenses paid
- Contact previously used actors

Output

-  YouTube: Tech/ audience/
-  iPhone app?

Issues

- Keep to day-t0-day, week-by-week detailed schedule

Plan B:

Documentary on joining the BMP

What’s that, you say? Fun and scary? How can such a thing be? Did it defy the laws of all physics? Well, I sat down with John Invisibleman for a quick Q&A session to get the skinny on the work I did this term, how I got there and most importantly, where I go from here.

JOHN INVISIBLEMAN: Michael, you are a legend in this university, and are also both wise and handsome. Tell me about the work you’ve produced this term. Are you pleased with what you’ve made?

MICHAEL: Well firstly thank you, John. And yes I think the work I’ve managed to produce is grand, simply grand.

JOHN: Okay don’t get smug. Anything in particular you think has worked well?

MICHAEL: Honestly, I think all of the individual pieces have worked out well. I’m particularly proud of the fact that they all consist of original material, and not just ripped-off YouTube clips. Anyway they each turned out how I intended them to, which makes me a happy man.

JOHN: Really? ‘Cos I saw that thing with the tramp, and I didn’t really get it. Also your hair is thick and shiny.

MICHAEL: I said it was grand, not comprehensible. I showed that video to David Lynch and he was like “Whuh?” Bad sign. But I’m kidding.

The fact is, I’m very proud of the artifacts I’ve made during this term, and the possibilities and ideas they’ve helped me come up with for future projects is making me crazy with excitement. But as I’ve said before I tend to come at things sideways, and there may have been a few clarity issues with some people. But honestly I think that’s a good thing, because ultimately it’s art. Even if it’s a crappy TV show or an abstract watercolour, it’s all still art and art shouldn’t be easy all the time. It should make you think and question and possibly itch a little.

JOHN: Okaaay… So did anything go wrong? Any mistakes you want to admit to? It’s important to learn from your mistakes.

MICHAEL: I know what you mean, like that time I shaved too close to my-

JOHN: Michael!! I meant about the work.

MICHAEL: Oh right. Well if I’ll be brutally honest, I think the only major thing I dropped the proverbial ball on was the interactive Power video. Probably could have made more of an interesting narrative than ‘Guy gets out of bed’.

JOHN: But reading all that nihilistic existential stuff you wrote about life gave me the impression that that was the point you were trying to make with your ‘boring’ video.

MICHAEL: True, but not everyone should have to read an essay before enjoying a slice of fun. I need to keep that in mind in future, and give a more visceral pop to my work, because that’s where I like to make my home.

JOHN: Cool. Speaking of existentialism, don’t you think you got a bit deep in that blog? You sounded so depressing!

MICHAEL: Me? Depressing? Don’t be ridiculous! And no I don’t think you can get too deep with this stuff. I enjoyed having the opportunity to explore such a diverse range of influences and let them guide and inspire my ideas further. From Alan Bennett to Sartre, Soderbergh to Fireman Sam, I pride myself on enjoying bring all these different flavours and ingredients together in one pot. Even gits like Banksy have inspired me. By the way John, your invisible fly is open.

JOHN: Whoops! Ahem. So, do you notice any recurring themes in your work this term?

MICHAEL: Yep. As a matter of fact John, I noticed them even before I was asked to by the tutors.

JOHN: Alright Michael, no one likes a clever dick. Go on then, what did you notice?

MICHAEL: Two things: identity, and the passive viewer becoming active. All three items deal with these themes on some level, and this was done very consciously. The idea of someone finding their own identity, what makes them who they are and letting that self-awareness empower them is, I think, an incredibly strong and sexy idea.

A lot of people, through ‘video collages’ (i.e. ripping off YouTube videos and sticking them all together to ‘create new meaning’) seemed to be saying that the media is controlling our minds, and that we should all be scared for our lives.

Well, it’s a valid point and one that I too am intrigued by. Are we storing our very souls online? Are we avatars of ourselves? But what I’ve tried to touch on, and what I really hope to explore on a more tangible level next year, is coming up with a feasible way to not only let the viewer become more engaged and active, but for them to also enjoy it on a new level. Basically, I want to make some form of Pilot ‘episode’ of a web series, where every individual viewer gets a different experience. Something akin to a nihilistic video game meets online TV series.

Whatever I make, either at uni or elsewhere in the future, it’s going to be a funhouse ride of excitement, fear, existential angst and partial nudity.

JOHN: Sounds awesome! I guess we’ll have to wait till next year to see what you’ll hopefully cook up.

MICHAEL: You know what John; you’re not so lame after all.

JOHN: Will you hold me, Michael?

MICHAEL: Yes, John. Yes I will.

JOHN: Oh by the way, you didn’t seem to take much notice of those Obstacles, did you?

M: The what now?

JOHN: Never mind.

Well my first proper photography session was a blast. Possibly because I was doing something new and exciting. Or possibly because Kim baked cookies. Either way it was fun. I, without any input from Kim, selected items from around her room (books, dvds etc etc) which I felt reflected her identity the most, and spread them all over her bed.

The input she did give was helping me compose the shot, as photography is a forte of hers. She suggested putting it down low so the objects at the front were in focus and the ones at the back blurred. This didn’t work very well because I specifically wanted to see ALL the objects very clearly and spread out. I didn’t actually tell her that I specifically wanted it shot from above, but it was interesting trying different positions and such.

She felt kind of awkward when looking directly into the camera when lying on the bed. She didn’t really know what to do with herself…

So I suggested that she closed her eyes instead, as if she were asleep. This turned out to be a bloody masterstroke, because it gave the image a kind of eerily serene feel, an edgier atmosphere. Almost as if she is either as peace with her stuff, or it subdues and pacifies her…

We set the camera so it took a black & white and a colour photo for each shot. I much preferred the colour shots because it emphasises the bright and garish nature of all the different forms of media around her. Anyway out of about 20 odd shots I chose the one of her ‘asleep’. I did suggest doing some with her naked but she wasn’t into that idea for some reason.

Oh and using Kim’s own camera to take the photos? It did not lack for poetry.

Post-production

You’ll see that I photoshopped the final photograph as opposed to just leaving it as it is. I gave the chosen photo a ‘Glow’ effect and richer, darker tone overall, to emphasise it’s dreamy-serene-eeriness. You can see the other photos I took on Flickr.

But taking the image was just half the story. The next and just as important half is uploading it onto Flickr and tagging it! And I did just that. I really enjoyed tagging it – and made sure to make them extra cross-overy to make it look more cubist and Hockneyesque. And it does look pretty darn cool with all the overlapping squares and rectangles – it really accentuates her being drowned in stuff.

...

It’s actually a kinda cool way to explore who she is, or at least who she wants us to see who she is… It’s fun to hover over each section and see what lies beneath. And for extra exploration, you can click on the centre square to find a link to her own Flickr profile, and in turn look at her own work!

Feedback from the group was generally positive. They seemed to get what it was about, they liked how she had her eyes closed – some saying she even looked dead. (Don’t think I’ll tell Kim that)

It was suggested that I could utilise the fact is was online even further, by maybe linking it to videos of Kim speaking, or flash animation of photographs etc. I do like the idea of this, it does have a lot of potential. I would like to do something like link to an online diary of Kim’s, so people could read her thoughts and what she’s doing. I doubt she’d let me do it but it’s an interesting idea.
Doing flash animations also intrigues me, it would be a good excuse to get to grips of how to do it. But at the same time, I like it’s simplicity. A lot of the time less is more, which I think is the case here. But I can see the potential and maybe I’ll come back to it later on and see what I can do.

Overall, it’s another success in my book!

Flickr allows users to upload and share their photography to millions of other users all over the world. Kim loves trawling through hundreds of photographs on there, and because like other social networks each user has a profile, they can all share and interact with each others work.

I reckon it would give more depth to the piece if I posted the photograph of her onto Flickr, as it’s closer to a specific passion of hers, it’s part of her identity, and it’s also a large online social network. It basically ticks more boxes than an automatic box-ticking machine at the International Box-Ticking Convention in Boxville, USA.

I searched through Flickr for photographs on identity, and the one below stood out the furthest. It’s simple yet effective, encapsulating the subjects ‘truths’ about who she really is in a very stark and unflattering way. I also like how she’s literally covered herself with the lies, clearly showing that she feels she hides behind them, and in turn who she really may be…

....

But what also intrigued me about this photo and Flickr in general was the tagging. When you tag someone on Facebook, the tag name simply appears in a solitary little grey box. But on Flickr the tags are clearly visible in these boxes around the thing you’ve tagged. This actually creates a really cool little effect, especially when the boxes overlap one another- creating almost a messy little collage on top of the photo.

This would look great with what I’m planning to do because they’ll be loads of objects to tag, creating a lot of overlapping boxes and therefore making it look even more like a collage. In fact it’s a lot like a David Hockney collage…

David Hockney

Robert Littman Floating in a Pool

Prehistoric Museum Near Palm Springs, 1982

What’s interesting to me about these collages is that each individual photo is a separate moment in time, a memory in itself, and yet despite being disjointed, Hockney manages to create coherent and visceral piece when looked at as a whole.

The collages are almost cubist, the way different images and angles and colours and lines and shapes all come together.

This is exactly the kind of cubist effect I want to create with my final piece using the tagging.

As I’ve said, the image I have in my head for the final memory piece is a my friend Kim lying on her bed, in her bedroom, completely surrounded by her paraphernalia, not just media-related, such as personal photos, diaries and toys, and of course magazines, dvds etc.

The best way to show this would be from overhead, looking down from directly above her. This will allow me to get all the items around her in the shot, but it also will evoke the idea of my perspective, my personal point of view of her, the way I perceive her through my eyes.

I instantly had the iconic image of American Beauty come to mind.

I would love if the viewers of the final photograph were reminded of this image in the back of their minds, because not only is it fantastic in it’s own right, but it resonates with Kim because the film happens to be one of her all time favourites.

I did some research on the cinematography of American Beauty, particularly for this image, and it became even more pertinent as the frequent use of roses throughout the film symbolises beauty. And the film as a whole has themes of finding the freedom to eschew material trappings to find an inner self. Which is like, really deep man. And also genuinely what I’m kind of saying with my idea.

In the past decade, the online world has completely changed our relationship with the real world with the arrival of social networks. Of course in reality social networks are nothing new. MySpace for example is simply GeoCities nine years on. But with the added bonus of numerous Flash and WMV movies auto-starting as the page loads.

So GeoCities begat MySpace, and when MySpace got all clogged up with spam and adverts, it begat Facebook. Then Facebook begat Twitter. It’s a never ending chain of cybershit.

Essentially, social networks allow users to create a profile with their personal details on, details that range from their age to their sister’s best friend’s brother’s mum’s favourite singer’s album track. Users can also upload photos and videoclips; they post blog entries and links to other stuff and leave witty little messages for one another. And it all comes together to form a thriving social network.

But what’s interesting is that these profiles people can create are such a visceral, objective projection of themselves onto others. It fascinates me the way we can imprint these ideas of ourselves onto the entire online world, and consciously form our own identities.

Me

Note the ‘Edit’ button near the top. We can easily manipulate our idea of how people perceive us on the online world, and in turn the real one.

The most prominent way people define themselves these days is through what media content they consume. If someone you’ve never met says hello to you online, you can cross reference with their profile to see what their like. You ignore what school they went to or what the pet’s name is. No – you look straight at what their favourite TV shows are and you instantly judge their personality accordingly.

So for example a Battlestar Galactica fan is a geek, a Corrie and Eastender fan is a girly gossip, and a Buffy fan is an intelligent and good-looking hunk.

The Idea

What I want to do is represent this idea of the media defining identity, and in turn the way people project this identity. Using photography. I’ll take a photograph of my best friend Kim, and literally surround her with the items she surrounds herself with that help form her identity. I almost have this image of her drowning in stuff – magazines, dvds, clothes, toys etc.

But I want to take it a step further and actually publish the photograph(s) onto a social networking site. Very meta-media-art. This could either be great, or it could in fact create a sort of black hole in cyberspace.

I’m thinking about utilising Facebook in particular because of it’s photo viewing tech, which allows you to ‘Tag’ people on photographs. I could therefore ‘Tag’ the items surrounding her to let the viewer explore what they are.

I like the idea that it being on Facebook is part of the art, as it gives it another dimension to it’s meaning. Hopefully…

When I got there the place was heaving. This was partly because it’s Banksy; but mostly because it was free admission. Anyway, on arrival you immediately get the idea: that he’s subverting the classical art that usually fills up most art museums, by ‘vandalising’ or altering sculptures and portraits etc.

One painting for example, depicts a busy Houses of Commons. But get this – instead of politicians on the benches, they’re monkeys!!!!!!! Tee hee hee, Banksy! You’re right! They are like monkeys aren’t they! Stupid bloody monkeys! You sure told them, Banksy. Well done.

After making my way through various paintings and installations, including a burnt out ice-cream van and a Stonehenge made of toilets, I then go into a large room full of cages with animals in them. Alas! My eyes deceive me once again, as on closer inspection they were not real animals – but in fact animatronics!

Little robotic chicken nuggets and hotdogs sip water from a bowl, and you smile and giggle as the cute mechanical bunny rabbit puts on make-up in front of a mirror.

Then suddenly WHAM! The message hits you like a bus: Animal cruelty and um… poverty and er… KFC and stuff. Blimey! In an instant, your world changes forever. Your eyes are opened. Mind blown, you stick your middle finger up at a Burger King on the way home. Nice one Banksy! You’ve shown us the truth!

Seriously though – it was actually the skill of the workmanship that’s gone into producing this stuff, plus the sheer quantity of work there that was what really impressed me – not the vague, pseudo-subversive messages behind them all. Brilliant details are lacquered onto every surface of work with care and well-crafted love. I found that side of it genuinely inspiring, considering how annoying he is.

Yet the detail and quantity confirm one thing: Banksy is clearly no longer a lone, onanistic graffiti artist walking the streets at night. These days he has an army of wankers, sorry – workers, giving him a hand (so to speak), making the rebel of Bristol as much of a heartless machine as the big corporations he tries so very hard to hate.

]]> http://butterz.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/memory-banksy-or-wanksy/feed/ 0 butterz B7 B4 B9 B3 B8 B5 http://butterz.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/memory-true-false/ http://butterz.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/memory-true-false/#comments Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:14:26 +0000 butterz http://butterz.wordpress.com/?p=355 Continue reading →]]> Development

I want to develop this idea of the falsity of memories, and question how well people really remember past experiences. Two years ago I found footage I filmed of the last day of high school, and quickly edited it to make it look grainy and put some cheesy music over it. Classic nostalgia. It got a huge response not just from the friends that were in my class (see comments below!), but from kids who go to the same high school now.

But I want to do the same sort of thing with photography for this theme. I had an idea which was to get a series of photographs from someone’s childhood, school days, holidays etc., and then underneath each one write the truth about what was really going on inside the persons mind at the time. Or maybe make it an audio piece and hear the truth.

An example would be something like this:

It could be almost like an installation piece, where I could put hundreds of photos on a wall such as this like a gallery. I was thinking instead of it just being that simple, the person viewing the picture had to do something to reveal the truth. Then I thought about writing it backwards, so that the viewer would have to use a mirror to reveal the real message, and in turn see the photograph in a new light, so to speak.

This use of mirrors making people see others differently was inspired by Alfred Hitchcock’s ‘Psycho’. If you look carefully, there are frequent and very specific placements of mirrors throughout Psycho which are there to visually reinforcement the idea that its main characters are living out multiple identities.

For example during her search of Mrs Bates bedroom, Lila steps toward the dressing table and sees herself reflected back and forth between two mirrors – creating reflections of reflections with the furthest showing the back of her head only, implying mixed identity. There are plenty of other examples throughout the film, and also other typically brilliant Hitchcockian usage of symbolism in it which I love to try and spot and deconstruct.

But looking at the reaction people gave to my video, or more specifically how they gave their reaction, gave me another idea. They posted them online. On a social networking site, which are a huge development in the way people construct and present their identities to others…

So here, in no particular order, are my Top 10 Favourite Kids TV Shows, the effect they had on me, and more importantly how good their theme tune was:

1) Animals of Farthing Wood – essentially an episodic soap-opera version of terrifying cult classic film Watership Down. Talking animals try to escape the clutches of Evil Man, who was of course attempting to cover the animal’s forest with Evil Cement. The brilliant voice cast performed it with such conviction it was like a Beckett play – but with rabbits and badgers.
Effect: Had me on the verge of tears and nervous breakdown every week. Probably.
Theme tune: 8/10

.

2) Aquila - Two lads find a spaceship. A spaceship that can do freakin’ anything.
Effect: Spaceship. ANYTHING! Nuff said.
Theme tune: 2/10 (But check out the opening sequence – I dare you not to move around pretending to dodge those CGI planets.)

.

3) Bucky O’Hare – Something about a green alien-rabbit kinda thing. Don’t remember the specifics that well but at the time I’m pretty certain he was the coolest green alien-rabbit thing ever.
Effect: An almost Pavlovian distrust of toads.
Theme tune: 9.5/10 (Let’s croak us some toads!)

.

4) Fireman Sam – What a guy! They don’t make them like Sam any more. Unless he’s been remade into a cold, CGI shadow of his former self for the Nougties, where he probably ‘Tweets’ in bed all day instead of saving locals from minor disasters.
Effect: Here’s probably not the place…
Theme tune: 10/10 (A bona fide classic)

.

5) Maid Marian and her Merry Men – Absolutely. Bloody. Brilliant. Parents loved it as much as the kids did. Tony Robinson wrote and performed in this irreverent comedy, that revelled in subverting the Robin Hood story and TV in general by turning it into a hilarious, anachronistic, and sometimes even musical parody. It was like a children’s Blackadder, except more consistently good and with better actors.
Effect: I remember whole gags word-for-word that still make me giddy to this day.
Theme tune: 10/10 (Sing along if you know the words: “Maaariaaaan….”)

.

6) Pokemon – Pocket monsters fighting each other, what’s not to love?
Effect: I never went a single morning before school without my fix of Pokemon and Coco-pops. And if I didn’t, there was trouble.
Theme tune(s): 9/10 (Fans: they’re on Spotify)

.

7) Round the Twist – Finding a kid from the 90s that didn’t love this show is like looking for a clean needle in an Indian landfill. Impossible in other words. On the surface it looked like a cheap Home & Away knock-off (which is saying something). But in fact it was a wonderfully surreal and fun show, with bonkers plots ranging from urination to ghosts, and male pregnancy to incest. Swear to God.
Effect: Very often it was down-right creepifying, and a whole generation of kids learnt the word ‘daggy’.
Theme tune: 10/10 (All together now: “Have you ever… Ever felt like this?”)

.

8 ) ZZZap! – Pure slapstick. A smorgasbord of wacky characters housed within a giant comic book the size of a house, that ranged from a pair of gloved hands to a French artist stereotype. Sounds baffling I know, but it was hypnotising in it’s simplicity (stemming from the fact it was originally designed for deaf children), and fun to watch absurdly dressed adults acting like dicks.
Effect: Thanks to ZZZap!, me and my fellow generation know the music of Boccherini‘s Menuet and Trio, from his String Quartet in E.
Theme Tune: 3/10

.

9) Roger and the Rottentrolls – An unfortunately oft-forgotten comedy with trolls. Narrated by Martin Clunes, it had the sheer nerve to go beyond funny and be pain-inducingly hysterical every episode.
Effect: One of those ‘recite-every-line-you-can-remember-from-yesterdays-show-on-the-playground-the-next-day’ type deals.
Theme Tune: 4/10

.

10) The Queen’s Nose – Imagine you could make a wish, any wish at all, and you wouldn’t even need some annoying blue genie voiced by Robin Williams to make it. All it takes in this series is a quick rub of a 50p coin, and anything you want it yours. With hilarious consequences of course.
Effect: If you ever see me making weird movements with my hand in my pocket, I’m simply rubbing a 50 pence coin. Honest.
Theme Tune: 10/10

.

So there you go - my televisual trip down memory lane. Do the same, and chances are you’ll be wondering what’s made your chest wet – then you’ll realise you’ve been crying on yourself for the last 10 minutes.

This short film ‘Nostalgia‘ directed by Matthew Toffolo, is about an estranged couple who meet again on the same bridge they originally met.

It represents the past and present relationship through the use of colour. The past, surprise surprise, is in black and white, and the present in colour. This immediately creates a sense of tedium because it’s simply a case of going back and forth between the two, making for very poor pacing. And the acting is as bad as it’s editing. Its even got the cheesy twinkling piano music in the background. But it is interesting how the directors tried to incorporate photography into it. It doesn’t quite pull off but I admire the effort.

Video artist Morgan Beringer experiments with different techniques, from abstract to animation. Visually it’s gorgeous, like looking through a watercolour kaleidoscope. I just love the sound in this video too – particularly the blustery bit, because it immediately evoked nostalgic memories of when you’re on the beach as a kid – with sand up your bum crack and seaweed in your hair. Browsing through his work I got a real sense of development and the level of detail was greater with every project.

This music video is a bit more like it. It’s a brilliant and fresh mix of video and animation to convey the power of photography has over evoking memories. Plus it’s a bloody good song.

Also interesting how it’s seen through first person perspective. Something which I’ve done with my other two artifacts, and I’d quite like to carry on with this artifact to give the three some coherence and sort of style as a whole.

Side by Side

One idea I had about nostalgia was showing the juxtaposition between the then and now. I thought about splitting the screen in two with a typically cheesy slide show on both sides. On one side have baby photographs, and on the other photographs of the what the person is like now.

I thought of this when my friends mum was showing me baby photos of him, and came across one of him throwing up in his baby chair. I said to her “you should see the photographs I have of him throwing up in the toilet!”. But with her rose-tinted mothers glasses on she could not believe her son would do such a thing.

So I could have his baby photos on one side, and the footage I have of him throwing up from my phone on the other side. On a loop! Over and over and over again…

]]> http://butterz.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/memory-nost-idea/feed/ 0 butterz SDC10387 vomit.jpg http://butterz.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/oompa-loompa/ http://butterz.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/oompa-loompa/#comments Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:40:46 +0000 butterz http://butterz.wordpress.com/?p=88 Continue reading →]]> Listen to me, people: Do not be fooled into believing that the news, documentaries or factual programmes are the most significant things you’ll ever watch on television, because they’re not. They’re not even close. By far the most important programmes that you will ever watch are the ones you saw as a child. That’s right – Kids TV.

Now unless you spent your entire childhood being locked in a dark cupboard by an insane Aunty who kept you alive by feeding you communion wafers through the crack at the bottom of the door, chances are your first experience of television came in the form of watching kid’s shows. And since children’s brains are essentially undeveloped primordial mush, these early TV memories etch themselves into your mind as deep as knobs and heart-signs carved onto an old school desk.

Kids TV shows take up a disproportionately large amount of nostalgic space amongst your childhood memories. Photos, for example, can barely ignite a flicker of a memory. Look through a couple of old snaps of you as a 7 year old kid and you might as well be staring at a picture of an alien standing in your living room (you know, when it used to have that awful wallpaper and those orange curtains). But then listen to the opening bars of your favourite kids TV shows theme-tune, and your mind is instantaneously flung backwards in time, where you’re sat on the sofa in your pyjamas, eating a bowl of Frosties and gazing up and the tele in pure unadulterated bliss.

Work that hose, Sam

We’ve all had the experience amongst friends when someone unconsciously starts humming the theme tune to Fireman Sam or Round the Twist, and suddenly everyone in the surrounding vicinity of the same age becomes embroiled in a frenzied discussion on each of your old favourite kids shows. You frantically start to recall and exchange memories of characters and catchphrases with such excitement, it’s as if you’ve stumbled into a secret room full of chocolate furniture and Andrex puppies.

Gradually, you find yourself managing to remember individual scenes from individual episodes more easily and enthusiastically then anything else your mind has garnered in recent years. And the more you exchange these increasingly vivid memories, the more you nod and grin and laugh-out-loud at not only what you’re remembering, but the fact that other people you didn’t even know back then were enjoying it just as much as you were.

The element that seems to stick most in people’s minds is the shows theme tune, which are a phenomenon onto themselves. Whether the show was a cartoon or drama, or if they were British, American or even Australia, it didn’t seem to matter – they all appeared to be composed by God-like geniuses who knew exactly how to bury mercilessly into the young viewer’s consciousness so the themes stayed there until the day we die.

Nowadays we have Youtube and Facebook, which allow us to relive and share these TV memories on a industrial scale. And in fact, once you get past the suffocating nostalgia and whimsy, many of the shows look down-right dodgy – once again strengthening the argument that things are never as good as you remember them to be. Regardless of this, there’s a strange mix of snobbery and genuine sympathy from so-called ’80s Kids’ and ’90s Kids’, both of whom believe that “Kid’s TV ain’t what it used to be, innit”. They glare down at the offerings given to children these days with utter discontent and pity, even though the kids themselves don’t know any better, and are probably more interested in Twittering and Wiiing online anyway than watching CBBC.

Which is a shame really, because a good kid’s TV show has the ability to transport and transform a child’s already fertile imagination – engrossing you, your siblings and friends in a blanket of utter enjoyment. They become a key element in countless individual’s childhoods, informing the dreams and thoughts of millions of people. Once older, you can close your eyes and remember them, and you won’t help but feel genuine warmth wash over you; the happy memories you associate with children’s TV will always make you smile, no matter how much you grow up.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got a DVD box-set of Postman Pat to get through.